There are two methods of oil mist detection, Obscuration and Light Scatter. The earlier forms of oil mist detector used an obscuration type detector, the most well known type being the early Graviners. Schaller use obscuration in their Visatron range of OMDs. Light scatter is a modern method of oil mist detection used by QMI and the Latest Graviner Mk6 OBSCURATION
The obscuration type of detector has the advantage of simplicity of operation. The disadvantages are that comparatively long runs of pipework from sampling points to detector are required, only one sample point is measured at a time, and regular maintenance is required if false alarms are to be avoided. The actual monitor is located close to the engine and therefore if a high oil mist alarm is activated, the natural instinct to check the detector should be resisted. Another major disadvantage of the obscuration type of oil mist detector is the relationship between oil mist density and the read out. As can be seen from the graph, the relationship is non linear. When there is no oil mist, then the read out is 100%. As the oil mist increases then a large change in the density of the oil mist is needed to change the obscuration read out by a small amount. Because of this non linear relationship, the monitor can not be graduated in units such as mg/l. It looks for deviation to trigger an alarm. Having said that, manufacturers claim that it is set to alarm at an oil mist concentration of 2mg/l. LIGHT SCATTER
An advantage of this system is that it is measuring from a true zero. If there is no contamination of the sample (ie no oil mist) then there is no read out. Another is that as the number of oil mist droplets increase in the sample the amount of scattered light increases in an almost linear relationship, thus making it easy to calibrate the read out in mg/l.
|
Friday, September 18, 2009
Oil mist detectors
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment